<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Railroad Ranch Update</title> <atom:link href="http://tetonvalleylodge.com/railroad-ranch-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tetonvalleylodge.com/railroad-ranch-update-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=railroad-ranch-update-2</link> <description>Idaho fly fishing since 1919 on the South Fork of the Snake, Teton and Henry&#039;s Fork rivers.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Matt Berry</title><link>http://tetonvalleylodge.com/railroad-ranch-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link> <dc:creator>Matt Berry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://tetonvalleylodge.com/?p=1826#comment-71</guid> <description>Thanks for your comments Sean.  Good to have an attorney weigh in.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Sean.  Good to have an attorney weigh in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean Moulton</title><link>http://tetonvalleylodge.com/railroad-ranch-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link> <dc:creator>Sean Moulton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:16:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://tetonvalleylodge.com/?p=1826#comment-65</guid> <description>All things being equal, I like where the Governor is going with this.  Consolidating State departments to avoid new taxes is a good thing. However, I understand the concern over losing a valuable public resource.  I&#039;d like more facts than the hearsay that the Standard Journal provides.  I would think that the State could establish a parks division within the Department of Lands to uphold the intent of the gift.  Most judges would be reluctant to come up with a ruling that would remove property from the public domain if there is a colorable &quot;professional parks agency&quot;.  The State would be wise to meet directly with the heirs and work out a settlement and put the issue to rest.  Unless something is resolved, it will give legs to what would otherwise just be bureaucrats whining about the consolidation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All things being equal, I like where the Governor is going with this.  Consolidating State departments to avoid new taxes is a good thing. However, I understand the concern over losing a valuable public resource.  I&#8217;d like more facts than the hearsay that the Standard Journal provides.  I would think that the State could establish a parks division within the Department of Lands to uphold the intent of the gift.  Most judges would be reluctant to come up with a ruling that would remove property from the public domain if there is a colorable &#8220;professional parks agency&#8221;.  The State would be wise to meet directly with the heirs and work out a settlement and put the issue to rest.  Unless something is resolved, it will give legs to what would otherwise just be bureaucrats whining about the consolidation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: tetonvalleylodge.com @ 2012-05-21 11:52:07 by W3 Total Cache -->
